Daily News Inc Home Page
Home FAQ RSS Links Site Map Contact Wednesday, 05.23.2012, 05:18am (GMT-4)
News Categories
Local
U.S. News
World
Politics
Entertainment
Crime
Health
Video
DNI Poll
Is Barack Obama a good President
Yes!
No!

 
Politics


White House considers military trial for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

Friday, 03.05.2010, 11:32am (GMT-4)

White House advisers are considering recommending alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed be tried in a military court instead of a civilian one in New York City, a senior administration official told CNN on Friday.

In November, Attorney General Eric Holder announced his intention to try Mohammed in a New York civilian court.

"I am confident in the ability of our courts to provide these defendants a fair trial, just as they have for over 200 years," Holder said last month. "The alleged 9/11 conspirators will stand trial in our justice system before an impartial jury under long-established rules and procedures."

A firestorm of opposition erupted from both New York officials and top Republicans after Holder's announcement.

New York police have estimated the cost to the city would exceed $200 million per year in a trial that could last years. They have said, among other things, that they would need to install more than 2,000 checkpoints in Lower Manhattan.

Also, some congressional leaders have argued Mohammed should not be entitled to all the protections and privileges a defendant receives in civilian court. Last month, several lawmakers tied funding to close the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to holding a military trial for Mohammed and other suspected terrorists.

To try Mohammed and others "as common criminals, giving them the constitutional rights of American citizens in our courts, is justice according to 'Alice in Wonderland,'" said Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut independent.

Holder said last month the Justice Department "will have to take into account" the views of other political leaders and residents. "At the end of the day, wherever this case is tried, in whatever forum, what we have to ensure is that it's done as transparently as possible and with adherence to all the rules."

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Friday the administration was evaluating its options "based on New York City logistical and security concerns."

Gibbs and senior presidential adviser David Axelrod have said previously that President Obama believes the trial should take place in a criminal court instead of before a military tribunal.

The senior administration official emphasized that no final recommendation has been given to the president and therefore no final decision regarding the 9/11 terror trial has been made.

The official said administration advisers hope a decision will be made before the president leaves for an overseas trip on March 18.

Progressive activists blasted the potential administration switch.

"If this stunning reversal comes to pass, President Obama will deal a death blow to his own Justice Department, not to mention American values," said Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

"If the president flip-flops and retreats to the Bush military commissions, he will betray his campaign promise to restore the rule of law, demonstrate that his principles are up for grabs and lose all credibility with Americans who care about justice and the rule of law."

CNN's Suzanne Malveaux contributed to this report


By Suzanne Malveaux, CNN White House Correspondent


Rating (Votes: 0)
Comments (0)  Tell friend  Print


Other Articles:
Reconciliation showdown ahead on health care (03.01.2010)
A chance for bipartisanship or election strategy? (02.09.2010)
Where does the Tea Party go from here? (02.08.2010)
Edwards' mistress seeks return of alleged sex tape (02.05.2010)
White House reveals secret cooperation with AbdulMutallab family (02.03.2010)
Obama budget includes money to house Guantanamo detainees in U.S. (02.02.2010)
White House eyes moving site of 9/11 trial (01.30.2010)
State of the Union speech unlikely to ease worries (01.26.2010)
A look at the U.S. Senate's use of the filibuster (01.20.2010)
Most prefer House's tax on rich over Senate's high-end policies (01.14.2010)



Events Calendar
May 2012
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
 

DNI - Picture - News

President Obama at a town hall meeting earlier this week pushing his health care reform plan

"The fact of the matter is there are not the votes in the United States Senate for a public option. There never have been," Conrad said on "Fox News Sunday."

His comment signaled a shift in the health care debate, with Obama and senior advisers softening their support for a public option by saying final form of the legislation is less important than the principle of affordable coverage available to all.

More on the story

 
Archive Search